| Today I would like to underline a topic that has | | | | unfair? So before you take off, let me outline the |
| always been on the mind of me as a Nascar fan | | | | major reasons why I think interchangeable driving |
| an collector. For years and years Nascar has been | | | | in multiple Nascar series (Sprint, Nationwide, and |
| a very competitive sport and each series (Sprint, | | | | Craftsman) seems unfair. |
| Nationwide, and Craftsman) have their own racers | | | | -Higher series drivers seem to have a veteran |
| and sponsors, even numbers! | | | | status with the Nascar sport and may have |
| The major factor I would like to discuss is the | | | | expertise when it comes to certain instances, like |
| fact that each series offers different features for | | | | tracks, care handling etc. |
| different skilled drivers and so forth. So would you | | | | -Each series of Nascar (Sprint, Nationwide, and |
| come to the conclusion to say that series | | | | Craftsman) have their own individual sponsors, |
| interchangeable drivers is fair? or unfair? By this I | | | | shouldn't they have their own drivers? not |
| simply mean should drivers like Kyle Busch or | | | | repeats, this would be to allow talent to flow |
| Kevin Harvick be able to drive in both the Sprint, | | | | through the sport at a somewhat higher rate with |
| and Nationwide Series (Also Craftsman, if applied)? | | | | more driver openings. |
| It has been my opinion for years that each series | | | | -Each series is meant for a certain driver, and if |
| is different so that other people can get into the | | | | they made it into the Sprint, Nationwide, or |
| certain series and gain coverage to someday race | | | | Craftsman cup series then aren't they where |
| the highest series which is currently the Sprint | | | | they are supposed to be? |
| Cup Series. Although with that being said we still | | | | -If each driver who interchanged or raced both |
| see a few drivers that race both series | | | | stayed in only one Nascar Series (Sprint, |
| simultaneously and have been for years. | | | | Nationwide, or Craftsman) then they could better |
| This factor seems very unfair in my eyes due to | | | | their chances of winning races by having more |
| the conclusion and assumption that higher ranked | | | | time to practice and optimize one car at one |
| series drivers have more of an edge due to their | | | | track instead of multiples. |
| somewhat of a veteran status with the Nascar | | | | -And lastly opportunity, give other rising Nascar |
| sport. Meaning that they have more track time, | | | | race car drivers the ability to get into the Nascar |
| and ultimately more practice and expertise under | | | | series by sticking to one series to offer more |
| their belt then the drivers in the Nationwide and | | | | open positions for upcoming drivers. |
| Craftsman Nascar series. Seeing that all these | | | | So what do you think? Comments are |
| variables are arguable I would like to hear your | | | | appreciated and will be responded to. Thanks for |
| responses on the topic and if you think it is fair or | | | | your patronage! |